Procedures vs. Work Instructions
I was recently working with a process
owner to modify one of his procedures.
And part of the conversation was that, in my opinion, his procedure looked more like a work instruction.
He felt that those details were necessary to perform the job and my answer was that those could be written in a work instruction for the specific task.
What has been your experience in this situation?
And part of the conversation was that, in my opinion, his procedure looked more like a work instruction.
He felt that those details were necessary to perform the job and my answer was that those could be written in a work instruction for the specific task.
What has been your experience in this situation?
Many spears
were broken when arguing on this comprehensive issue. Here below we express
only an opinion.
1. It is
not a good idea to argue about terminology, but worth agreeing upon it. This fully applies to the names of the
QMS documented information. Each organization sets its own documented
information ‘pyramid’. The requirements of ISO 9001:2015, as well as the 2008
guidelines of ISO 10017 and the recommendations 176 TC reports give full
freedom to the organization. Therefore, it is better not to talk about the
requirements, but better about good practices and experience.
2. Definition
and etymology of the word.
Procedure -
specified way to carry out an activity or a process. (In ISO 8402:1994: Procedure - specified way to perform an activity)
The term ‘procedure’ is of Latin origin and means ‘advance’,
‘go step by step’.
3. In the
current practice of QMS development, implementation, and certification in compliance
with ISO 9001:2015, a procedure:
•
is used to describe the QMS processes as per clause
4.4 ISO 9001:2015;
•
answers the questions: ‘Who does?’ (Responsibility and
authority of the process owner and operators), "What to do?" "In
what order?", "When to do?" (Frequency), "Where to do?"
(possible link to subdivisions as per Provisions of subdivisions);
•
describes the interaction of a process with other QMS
processes (a good practice is to use a process models in accordance with
sec 0.3 ISO 9001:2015 TC 176 reports recommendations);
•
contains steps for working with processes criteria;
•
contains actions to address risks and opportunities in
the process (or references to those actions).
Basically, a
procedure may include a description of the technological rules (method) to
conduct an activity – contain the answer to the question ‘How to do?’ There are
no regulatory contraindications with respect to such decisions.
But as per
the established practice, the rules to conduct an activity (the answer
to the question "How to do?"), if necessary, are set in the work
instructions or methodologies.
4. Practical Recommendations
Do not try to establish an ‘iron curtain’
between the procedures and work instructions.
When
developing procedures, as well as other documented information, it is important
to maintain a balance between a procedure being self-sufficiency (the
user must be able to work with the procedure without having to search for a
variety of other normative documentation via references) on one hand, and not
being overloaded (excessive detail obscures understanding the essence)
on the other.
These scales
are always swinging, particularly at the stages of development and
implementation. At some point, we have to add something, at another we are
forced to cut. And that’s Ok. If the documented information ‘breathes’, it
means that the QMS is ‘alive’, and not just exists somewhere in a heap of trash
documents (according to our subjective assessments, such a possibility is «fifty-fifty»).
A few common
recommendations.
1) Formalize a
part of the procedure into a separate regulatory document (for example,
operating instructions or techniques, or ...) with the corresponding reference:
• If more
details are required;
• if this
part is modified more frequently than others - to simplify modification.
2) Actively
use validation of documented information before its approval. This
recommendation of ISO 10013 is very valuable. Psychologically users scribble ‘drafts’
easily and naturally.
More on Control of Documented information
ISO 9001:2015 Quality System Procedure - Control of Documented Information
ISO 9001:2015 Quality System Procedure - Control of Documented Information
- Describes Criteria and Risks of ‘Control of Documented Information’ Process
- Contains Process Model diagram with detailed inputs and output
- User-friendly format and professional layout - reviewed and approved by experienced ISO 9001 quality auditors.
- Lists Documented Information requirements referencing the clauses of ISO 9001:2015
- Provides recommendations for Documented information maintenance for each clause.
No comments:
Post a Comment